• Subscribe
  • About Us
  • Earn CE
  • Free Samples
  • Innovator Awards
    1. Restorative Dentistry

    I think my implant needs a root canal

    June 13, 2012
    It is a safe assumption that calculus under a prosthesis and around the implant platform has been accumulating from the day the prosthesis was inserted. Dr. Chris Salierno, co-editor of Surgical-Restorative Resource e-newsletter, goes over a clinical case of his own to explain that prosthesis removal on an annual basis may be necessary in order to combat the factors that lead to tooth loss.
    Content Dam Diq Online Articles 2012 July Drchrissalierno
    About two years ago I inserted a full-arch implant restoration for one of my favorite patients. A periodontist and I had given his remaining mandibular dentition the death sentence (Fig. 1) and treatment planned a screw-retained, acrylic-to-metal, fixed prosthesis, or “hybrid.” After a year of wearing an immediate complete denture as a provisional, my patient was thrilled to throw out the denture adhesive and enjoy eating steak again (Fig. 2).
    Jun2012salierno01
    Fig. 1: Initial presentation of a patient with severe periodontal bone loss and generalized Class II mobility of mandibular dentition.
    Jun2012salierno02

    Fig. 2: Completed mandibular “hybrid” restoration on six Neoss implants. The patient dutifully came in for his six-month recall visits and used an oral irrigator at home. My hygienist used a plastic curette and would remove plaque and calculus where she could find it. The patient would ask me, “How does everything look?” “Umm ... great!” was my usual response. After a couple of years of this routine, the patient appeared in my schedule with an odd chief complaint: “I think my implant needs a root canal.” He had spontaneous, intermittent discomfort on one of his anterior implants for a few weeks, and it was slowly getting worse. Clinical inspection revealed some plaque on the abutments (Fig. 3) but nothing out of the ordinary.

    Jun2012salierno03
    Fig. 3: Plaque accumulation visible on abutments that are not covered by a flange of acrylic.

    We decided to remove the prosthesis and have a look. The first thing I noticed was the severe accumulation of calculus on the prosthesis (Figs. 4 and 5). Next I noted the calculus embedded in the peri-implant sulcus of the No. 24 implant (Fig. 6).

    Jun2012salierno04
    Jun2012salierno05

    Figs. 4 and 5: Intaglio surface of prosthesis revealing severe calculus accumulation in the anterior segment.
    Jun2012salierno06
    Fig. 6: Calculus detected in peri-implant sulcus of the implant in tooth position No. 24.

    Removing the calculus from the peri-implant sulcus was accomplished with a plastic curette relatively easily (Fig. 7). More challenging was the removal of the calculus from the intaglio surface of the prosthesis.

    Jun2012salierno07
    Fig. 7: Calculus is removed with the aid of a plastic curette. It is a safe assumption that the calculus under the prosthesis and around the implant platform had been accumulating from the day the prosthesis was inserted. Despite good home care and faithful hygiene recall appointments, it should have been assumed that calculus unable to be reached with routine care would accumulate. The “hybrid” prosthesis can introduce unusual prosthetic contours that are difficult, if not impossible, for routine hygiene to access. After the prosthesis was cleaned and reinserted, the patient was instructed to use a solution of 0.06% chlorhexidine in the oral irrigator reservoir rather than water. At a two-week follow-up, the patient noted the symptoms had been relieved. While oral irrigation with chlorhexidine will help reduce the plaque and gingivitis, this patient will still need to have his prosthesis removed periodically. How often? Patients who were on three- or four-month hygiene recalls when they had teeth will still generate significant amounts of calculus. In this clinician’s opinion, prosthesis removal on an annual basis may be necessary in order to combat the factors that lead to tooth loss. The goal is to have proactive discussions with patients about their various implant prostheses and determine their ability to be maintained hygienically. Clearly, the retrievability of a prosthesis becomes more critical as more unusual prosthetic contours are introduced.Editor’s note: Drs. Scott Froum and Chris Salierno will be presenting on implant complications on Aug. 4, 2012, in Las Vegas. For more information, click here.Author bio Chris Salierno, DDS, is a general dentist practicing in Melville, N.Y., and co-editor of Surgical-Restorative Resource e-newsletter. He lectures and writes about practice management and clinical dentistry. Additional content is available on his blog for dentists: www.thecuriousdentist.com. You may contact Dr. Salierno by email at [email protected].

    Latest in Restorative Dentistry

    Figure 1: NeoScan 1000 from Neoss
    Primary
    Content Dam Sr Online Articles 2018 06 18jun14piaclintipt
    Figure 1
    Mg 9695
    Figure 1: The purpose of an implant verification jig is to mimic the fit of the final frame. A verification jig allows you to verify the accuracy of the model and ensure an accurate final frame every time.
    19 Nov14 Pi Ajurim Thumb